| |
Implementation period of standard ERP systems |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Excerpt from the Konradin Study 2007:
"The runtime of projects has in comparison to the survey in 2005
become shorter over all the surveyed time spans. This meant that a
quarter of the companies were already able to use their ERP solution
after 3 months, in 2005 this was still 16.4%. This is also an indication
that the projects overall have become lower scale and clearer,
also displayed through the investments. In 29.7% of the businesses
the implementation took 4 to 6 months (2005 = 32%). In 30.7%
of the businesses the implementation took 7 to 12 months (2005 =
33.3%). About 15.7% required longer than a year (2005 = 18.4%).
In the industry sectors of the process industry, metal industry, machine
construction and electronic industry the system implementation took
an average of 9.3 months. This is slightly shorter than the time it took
two years ago."
|
|
| |

|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Implementation period of abas ERP
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Excerpt from the Konradin Study 2007:
"The average implementation period of the abas Business Software is
0.4 months longer than two years ago at 8.1 months. Apart from the
implementation period for projects up to 3 months which has almost
doubled, the numbers in the other time windows have only increased
very slightly. However, the number of projects which take longer than
a year have decreased drastically."
|
|
| |

|
|
| |
|
|
| |
go back to overview of ERP study 2007 |
go to "Total investments" |
|
| |
Download entire ERP study 2007 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
In der Studie wurden folgende Produkte bewertet:
abas-Business-Software (ABAS), b2 (Bäurer), FOSS (ORDAT), mySAP (SAP),
Oxaion (Oxaion), P2plus (AP), Proalpha (Proalpha), Psipenta (Psipenta),
SoftM Suite (SoftM), SAP/R3 (SAP) |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|